My Photo

WAA

  • Join the WAA

    Web Analytics Association MemberI'm a member of the Web Analytics Association. If you're not a member, JOIN TODAY!

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Recently on this blog
Recently on other blogs

Add to Social Networks, Blog, Bookmark

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Clicky

  • Clicky Web Analytics

Tool Migration

April 23, 2008

Web Analytics Data Reconciliation How-To Guide

I suspect that most experienced web analysts have done at least one data reconciliation project during the course of their tenure.  For something so common, however, it rarely gets discussed. 

Sure, it's not sexy like Angelina Jolie, but even Plain Jane likes a little attention now and then.

Data reconciliation is an important foundational activity because, when done well, it will inspire people to have confidence in the data that you share with them. Data quality will never be perfect, but it should be good enough for everyone to feel that they can make sound business decisions based on what's available.

Enough pep talk.  If you're on the brink of your first data reconciliation project, here's what to do:

1) Identify your two data sources

The need for data reconciliation arises when you have two separate systems that provide similar sets of data.  One of these sources - let's call it "Primary Source" - will necessarily be your standard web analytics application.  The other one - let's call it "Secondary Source" - can be one of several things, namely:

  • An upstream system, like campaigns (banner, search, email)
  • A downstream system, like commerce or downloads or form submissions
  • A parallel system, such as when you migrate from one web analytics tool to another.  In this case I'd advise you to break your project into smaller chunks according to individual reports you care to reconcile.

2) Learn how your primary source gets collected

Read the documentation and talk to your internal tech team.  Be clear on the scope of the data you're collecting - ie exactly which pages are tagged, or exactly which log files are processed.  If you're using page tags, know whether the tag is placed at the top or the bottom of the page (this will affect when the tag fires, which in turn affects the level of data loss to some extent).  Make note of any special filters, transformations or business logic used here.

3) Learn how your secondary source gets collected

If your secondary source is a parallel web analytics system, repeat the process you followed in step 2, above. 

If it's an upstream system you're stuck with whatever documentation and lore you can glean regarding how that works. 

If it's a downstream system you'll need to identify the group within your business that owns that system, then grill them on how they do data collection and how they transform the data into the metric you're trying to reconcile.  There's a lot of variability here, especially if your downstream system is homegrown, so be sure to do a thorough investigation.  As in step 2, make note of any special filters, transformations or business logic used here.

4) Compare data sets

Applesoranges Pick a sensible date range and granularity level, then pull corresponding data from both sources.  A good default would be daily totals for a month.  If you're dealing with really high volume you may want to isolate a subset of your data based on some attribute that you can reliably pull from both sources, like a single URL (for downloads) or a single product (for commerce).

Now put your data sets side by side in Excel and calculate the delta.  Compare the trends over time and see if you can explain the differences.  Ask yourself, are you comfortable with the differences you see?  If not, consider fine-tuning the way you pull data from your primary and/or secondary source in order to account for those differences.

Reality check: you're never going to get a perfect match.  This is a good exercise, but know when to say when. Do not obsess!

5) Document and share your findings

This is the most important step.  Write a report about what you've done and what you've found.  Now go talk to people - give a verbal presentation of findings to your web analytics colleagues and your concerned data stakeholders. 

At this point you should be able to speak with confidence about the differences in the two data sources, and your goal should be to pass this confidence on to the people around you.  Save your report for future reference, as newcomers are likely to ask the questions you've already answered.

6) Plan to revisit if necessary

If reconciliation is part of tool migration, you are now done.  Good work.

If your secondary source is an upstream or downstream system, plan a periodic audit to make sure your findings are still valid.  If your systems are stable you can get away with doing this maybe once a year, but if you have any appreciable changes - like a major site redesign or a shopping cart overhaul - you may wish to do another quick round of reconciliation at that time.

October 28, 2007

The Upside of Tool Migration

I've been reflecting, lately, on a major web analytics tool migration project that I recently saw through to completion.  To be honest it was not a simple task.  As the news of Omniture's acquisition of Visual Sciences sinks in, I realize that we as an industry have got a few tool migration projects brewing.  Maybe more than a few. 

Faced with the prospect of this work, and in the spirit of optimism, I'd like to mention some of the positive outcomes of a tool migration project.  Even if it is a giant hassle it can be quite beneficial in the end.  Here's why:

  • Get the big picture.  If you've had the same measurement system for quite a while, chances are you've got data trickling out in all directions.  Switching tools means that you'll have to take stock of all downstream destinations.  Nothing quite like this exercise to show you just how widely used your data actually is.
  • Clean house.  Got something that's broken?  Who doesn't.  No matter how great your existing system is, something could stand to be improved.  Now's your chance to fix a misconfigured tag element, update a report, or kill off a feed that's gone stale.
  • Build trust.  Repeat after me, "Watch the trend, not the absolute," and, "Data quality sucks, get over it."  Right?  Some people will always question the integrity of web activity data.  When you make the switch you'll have to reconcile your numbers to some extent, but it also gives you renewed opportunity to show just how confident you are that the data is sound, valid, and worthy of business decision-making.
  • Cultivate skills. Who wouldn't jump at the chance to add a bullet point to the skills section of their resume?  A new tool means new opportunity for web analysts, and it can be a refreshing change for those who've been working with the same tools for a long time.

Go on, call me a pollyanna - I'm being mighty optimistic.  I know we've got an unexpected load of work sprung upon us, and it's going to take a while to get through it all.  But I really do think we'll come out of it in better shape than we're in now.